Why Is Winoground Hard? Investigating Failures In Visuolinguistic Compositionality | Awesome Learning to Hash Add your paper to Learning2Hash

Why Is Winoground Hard? Investigating Failures In Visuolinguistic Compositionality

Anuj Diwan, Layne Berry, Eunsol Choi, David Harwath, Kyle Mahowald . Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing 2022 – 14 citations

[Code] [Paper]   Search on Google Scholar   Search on Semantic Scholar
Datasets EMNLP Image Retrieval

Recent visuolinguistic pre-trained models show promising progress on various end tasks such as image retrieval and video captioning. Yet, they fail miserably on the recently proposed Winoground dataset, which challenges models to match paired images and English captions, with items constructed to overlap lexically but differ in meaning (e.g., “there is a mug in some grass” vs. “there is some grass in a mug”). By annotating the dataset using new fine-grained tags, we show that solving the Winoground task requires not just compositional language understanding, but a host of other abilities like commonsense reasoning or locating small, out-of-focus objects in low-resolution images. In this paper, we identify the dataset’s main challenges through a suite of experiments on related tasks (probing task, image retrieval task), data augmentation, and manual inspection of the dataset. Our analysis suggests that a main challenge in visuolinguistic models may lie in fusing visual and textual representations, rather than in compositional language understanding. We release our annotation and code at https://github.com/ajd12342/why-winoground-hard .

Similar Work